Houston, TX – As reported by the Chronicle, Mayor Annise Parker recently hired some Rice students to come up with solutions to BARC’s miserably low Save Rates. ARA spokesperson, Christopher Newport is quoted as saying “It’s going to be useful for the council members. What they want to know is, ‘What can we do?’ You can’t really start grappling with that until you’ve got a tool in your hands like what these students provided”.
Apparently, Mr. Newport and Annise Parker have chosen to forget about the 2005 Mayor’s Task Force report which pinpointed many problems at BARC and offered many good solutions. This lack of memory is stunning considering Parker actually served on the Task Force and she reminded animal lovers and voters many times of this fact while running for election to the Mayor’s office the first time — for instance in her Policy Brief (see it at this link AnniseParkerPolicyBrief-2009)
Newport and Parker have also chosen to forget that in September 2009, the international, No Kill expert, Nathan Winograd came to Houston and assessed BARC. Mr. Winograd prepared a 200 page report which details EXACTLY how BARC can stop killing healthy and treatable pets and achieve 90% or more Save Rates. That was 3 ½ YEARS ago. Remarkably, Parker even recommended that the city “Listen to the Experts” including Nathan Winograd, in her Policy Brief (linked above), yet she has failed to take her own advice.
If Annise Parker had hired leadership dedicated to saving lives when she first took office and required that BARC vigorously implement expert, Nathan Winograd’s recommendations, BARC would be well on its to No Kill by now. Instead, BARC’s Save Rates have DECREASED every single year that Annise Parker has been in office. EVERY SINGLE YEAR.
For those who are not familiar with Nathan Winograd, he created the first Open Admission, No Kill shelter in the US, which saved all healthy and treatable animals entering their doors. Only the irremediable suffering were euthanized (this is the true definition of euthanize). His shelter was responsible for animal control for 8 municipalities, yet they still saved 90% or more of all animals entering their doors.
Since then, 90+ other Open Admission facilities, representing approximately 300 communities, have followed the same No Kill model of sheltering (called the No Kill Equation) and those shelters have achieved the same successes. When shelters vigorously implement (i.e. not half-assed as is the case at most kill shelters) all of Winograd’s recommendations, they stop killing too.
Many of those 90+ Open Admission shelters have reached No Kill while the city of Houston has had Winograd’s assessment report in their hands. More than 80 Open Admission shelters have passed Houston by on their way to No Kill, while the Kill Rates at Houston’s pound continue to rise, year after year.
In addition to having a step-by-step No Kill guide for BARC, BARC employees attended the national No Kill Conference in Washington DC in 2012. Present at this conference were people who have actually stopped shelter killing in their communities, and they taught classes on how they achieved their successes.
So, Annise Parker and BARC leaders know EXACTLY what needs to be done at BARC to stop the killing — the tools are already in their hands, and have been there for over 3 1/2 years.
But, instead of using those tools, as Parker promised and recommended, she has chosen to ignore them and asked some college students to come up with “more” solutions.
The sheer insanity of choices made for BARC is simply stunning.
Don’t get me wrong, I’m sure the students’ motivations were well meaning. But did they research the many other Open Admission shelters that have already reached No Kill? I have not seen the report, but the Chronicle article does not mention many of the crucial components of the successful No Kill model of sheltering, so it does not appear that the students researched what is already working. So, essentially the students’ solutions are merely a guess.
Why did Parker even ask college students to come up with solutions in the first place, when she already has the solutions and all the tools necessasry to stop shelter killing?
The answer? Asking the college students to come up with solutions is just a “bait and switch” charade and nothing more than the Mayor’s attempt to divert attention away from the fact that she has totally failed keep her No Kill promises. She has never bothered to require that her employees do their jobs well and implement the solutions that have already been proven to work and already in her hands, so she asks someone else to come up with “other” solutions.
Annise Parker has repeatedly promised that she would do everything in her power to transition Houston to a No Kill city.
Nathan Winograd gave Houston detailed solutions in September 2009.
The only thing that Annise Parker has to do is DEMAND that her employees do their jobs and vigorously implement all of the recommendations in Nathan Winograd’s assessment report.
For almost 3 1/2 years, she has failed.
It is foolish, wasteful and dishonest to squander time, money and lives by continuing to refuse to implement proven solutions, and by asking others, with absolutely no life-saving shelter experience, to “guess” about solutions. It a reprehensible and reckless use of our tax dollars and a reckless loss of precious lives that:
- she has allowed BARC’s kill rates to INCREASE every single year that she has been in office;
- she has allowed BARC to continue to ILLEGALLY ban volunteers;
- she allows BARC to continue to kill animals that others have offered to save;
- she allows BARC to make it harder for foster parents and rescuers to pull animals from BARC to safety;
- she has not hired a director for BARC that is dedicated to saving lives—one willing to work hard to implement the programs that are saving 90% of animals in shelters all around us;
- she has hired a director for BARC that does not even work onsite all day, but only makes a short appearance periodically;
There are a lot of things that BARC leadership and Annise Parker could be doing at this moment to save hundreds more lives every month, that would literally cost the city absolutely NOTHING, yet the Mayor and BARC leadership continue to refuse to implement these programs and services.
It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to see where BARC’s problems lie. It is the same problem that has plagued BARC for years — LEADERSHIP. Annise Parker and BARC manager, Greg Damianoff that just do not care if BARC stops killing.
As I have said before, that problem could be solved with a pink slip.
I urge everyone to demand that Annise Parker (and your city council member) require BARC to vigorously implement the recommendations in Nathan Winograd’s 2009 assessment report. Call, write letters, fax and/or email them. (Their contact information is linked here.)
If you just don’t have time to call or write, I have created a petition that will send them an email each time someone signs. You can find the Petition here. Please SHARE it with all of your friends and family.
If we all do not speak up and demand better, BARC and city of Houston will continue the “business as usual” as a high kill pound forever. This is an election year for the mayor and city council members, so remind them that you vote.
If you wish to receive an email notification each time I post a new blog here, please click the small Follow link in the bottom right corner of your screen. (Note: you can only see the link if you are reading this from my blog site. The link does not show if you are reading this from the email version)
Friend me on Facebook and Pinterest.
Follow No Kill Houston on Facebook and Twitter, and subscribe to their email list.
Follow No Kill Texas Advocates, a No Kill political advocacy group, on Facebook and Twitter, and register to receive their newsletter.
Can not get petition to Download. Thank you
Sent from Randy’s iPhone
Hmmmm. I’m not sure why you can’t get it to download. It is working fine for me. Perhaps the site doesn’t work well with iPhones?? Here is a link: http://www.change.org/petitions/houston-city-council-implement-the-no-kill-model-of-sheltering
Sadly a lot of policies need to be changed in how a municipal shelter operates. I think volunteers should be allowed to work at BARC. But the reality is that a bunch of Volunteers do not understand the laws and policies of the animal control division. Often times they are not willing to work within set guide lines. Handled right a volunteer group could be a huge asset for BARC. Ms. Parker should appoint one person to work nothing but a volunteer program. Guide lines could be set up by the city attorneys as to how and what the volunteers are allowed to do, when they are allowed to do it. Volunteers could be made to sign a non disclosure notice and be made to follow a specific guide line for any complaints. I would love to set a program up at BARC. I know both sides of the issue and understand both sides. I hate to see the animals suffer because of conflict between people.
I agree that volunteers are a tremendous asset to any shelter. It is free labor and free advertising when they talk to their friends. However, BARC has consistently take away more and more responsibilities that volunteers used to perform. On one hand, BARC leadership blames the public for their killing, but when that public steps up and offers to help, they are consistently shut out.
What BARC is lacking is a leadership that is dedicated to saving lives and who is willing to work hard to implement the programs that are already working around the country. When leadership such as this is in place, shelters have tripled their volunteer bases and this is even in tiny towns with a fraction of the citizens that Houston has. Houston has 2.2 million citizens. That is 2.2 million potential volunteers, adopters, foster parents etc. It is an utter waste to not take advantage of Houstonians’ generosity.